The Gram Code Editor - 2026-09-07

rubyroach: apologies, I can't answer your question. But I can tell I would love the feature that makes any "task" a potential "debug task", that would reduce duplication of settings for me. There is some pytest integration already, and it already lets you run/debug individual tests without creating dedicated entries in the .jsonc files, so you should probably have a look at how this is implemented? I remember krig saying that he did not like how hardcoded python-related stuff is, currently. ✏

rubyroach: apologies, I can't answer your question. But I can tell I would love the feature that makes any "task" a potential "debug task", that would reduce duplication of settings for me. There is some pytest integration already, and it lets you run/debug individual tests without creating dedicated entries in the .jsonc files, so you should probably have a look at how this is implemented? I remember krig saying that he did not like how hardcoded python-related stuff is, currently. ✏

Hi everyone, just started using gram, looks very clean and nice. Thank you :) A question to maintainers; do you plan to implement math rendering in markdown view? This is the biggest problem I have with zed and they do not plan unfortunately.

right now there’s no plan, but I’m not opposed to adding it

I would like to work on it, though I am only a person with very sketchy scientific python background 😑

Related PR from Zed: https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/61892 Related discussions from Zed: https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/discussions/24224

Hmm, that PR looks very sloppy and the ratex crates it pulls in look questionable as well.. if I were to merge math support I don’t think I would go this route.. but I’ve only taken a quick glance at it